Quasar Questions
-
by jtreisner
I'm looking for some advice on how I can rule out possible look alikes (distant, well defined round galaxies, stars, etc) from possible lensed quasars. Is there a way, for example, that I can rule something ok by using a specific filter in tools (R/G/I/Z, etc)?
Some specific objects I've stumbled across that I have thought were possibilities but don't know if there is some other more plausible explanation. If there are some easy tricks I could use to quickly rule out lensed quasars (where I can't see a lensing galaxy), it would be much appreciated!
ASW0000u9f - two bright white/purple dots at ~6:30
ASW0008323 - two bright red/white dots at ~3
ASW0008185 - two right white/red dots at bottom right
ASW0000bsp - two bright red dots (next to a third dissimilar dot) at ~12
ASW00009ut - two bright white/green dots at ~3 - this one perhaps looks a little different than my previous examples
ASW0008rao - two fainter red dots at ~12 - this one also looks different than the first three examples (quite a bit dimmer, a little fuzzier)
Posted
-
by ElisabethB moderator
Hi jtreisner,
Welcome to Space Warps !
All your examples seem to be two stars appearing close together, except for the last one, where I think it is a merger of two ellipticals.
The best way to get to see the difference is looking at a lot of images I suppose.
Happy hunting ! ๐
Posted
-
by jtreisner
Thanks! I guess that leads me into some followup questions:
- Is there any rule of thumb that can be used for identifying quasars vs. stars (too big / too fuzzy / too red / too dim, doesn't show up in a certain spectrum, etc)?
- I take it that for two stars to be so similar in appearance (color, size, brightness), they would also be of roughly the same age, formed in the same part of our galaxy, etc, or could it just be coincidental (one is bigger than the other, but closer, etc)?
Sorry, just curious!
Thanks again.
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
Actually, I wish I could get someone to give me some examples of quasars in CFH telescope. I looked through the CFH telescope website for some examples, but I wasn't smart enough to find many. Most scientific articles don't publish images, because quasars all look much the same, and anyway, I would have to pay to see the article.
In the CFH telescopes we are not supposed to know which area of the sky we are looking at, so we can't consult the NED database to see which bright "stars" are quasars.
from http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Space_Warps_Project_Needs_Your_Help_999.html
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12007-new-quasar-is-the-oldest-yet.html#.Ul-s4BCGgp8
There are 100,000 quasars, and many of them have been posted in Galaxy Zoo, and that is where my experience is.
So... I think quasars should be bright and round.
Bright, even the distant ones at z=5 (the red ones)are still quite bright.
Shape, round and not too fuzzy, the more distant ones are quite small but a good round shape.
Most will be bright blue or red-blue, not a white-blue. See Colours of Galaxies in SDSS : Redshift chart http://www.galaxyzooforum.org/index.php?topic=277142.0. The colours are the same in CFHT. The nearest ones that can be lensed are at a distance of about z=0.6, so they are blue. Quasars have lots of blue and UV light, so when you press the bluer button in tools, it should stay blue. More distant quasars are progressively pink, blue, green, orange, yellow, red (the furthest that we can see).
Here are some lensed quasars in images taken by the SDSS telescope.
Re: Part 3 Double quasars in SDSS,... and triple, and quadruple.
A green one was posted by 1000GGG, AlexandredOr correctly suggested that it might be a lens
http://www.galaxyzooforum.org/index.php?topic=275811.msg355411#msg355411http://skyserver.sdss3.org/dr9/en/tools/explore/obj.asp?id=1237667735586078852
Binary stars might be identical twins, and might look like a double quasar.
The only was to tell for sure that a bright object is a quasar is to do a spectral analysis to look for the Lyman alpha peak, and that is expensive.Posted
-
by c_cld
Hi Budgie,
Please see http://talk.spacewarps.org/#/boards/BSW0000004/discussions/DSW00007l0I'd also cross-match QSO catalog with CFHTLS giving ~1000 spectroscopic objects. I'll post a sample of them in different bins of redshift from CADC/CCDA.
Cheers
Posted
-
by c_cld
see also http://talk.spacewarps.org/#/boards/BSW0000004/discussions/DSW00007j7
1237679341103874245 object in QSO color space
Posted
-
by c_cld
CFHTLS image cutout service
image size: 60 arcsec on the side for all sample
centered on QSO1237673701279531827 z spec=5.421
1237661385994928507 z spec=3.386
1237670955181211840 z spec=3.0
1237663479259660624 z spec=2.497
1237655368759050276 z spec=2.107
1237653502043685001 z spec=1.517
1237659324406038647 z spec=1.074 deblended in SDSS
1237652900227579955 z spec=0.989
1237663478722265334 z spec=0.881
1237661417675948100 z spec=0.720
1237659150458028243 z spec=0.527
1237663543147298845 z spec=0.400
1237659326016585782 z spec=0.326
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
Thank you for the quasar tour, c_cld. You are a star!
I should have remembered the Thick blue ring, it's just too perfect post.
The quasars are much whiter than in SDSS. What happened to the blue colour?
The image texture of the CFHT cutouts look different from the SpaceWarps images that we are presented with.
But the quasars are big, round and bright.
Posted
-
by jtreisner
Thanks guys - I think that's about as clear as mud ๐ It does definitely help reading your post Budgieeye and seeing all the examples and reading the other threads that c_cld linked though. Since it seems like stars and quasars can be look alikes even to the pros I guess I'll just keeping on marking potential candidates when I see them.
Also, the galaxy zoo thread you linked - all the pictures just are black and say failed to initialize or something like that on them. Not sure if that's a problem on my end though.
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
The quasar points, double and quads posted are too dim to be quasars.
After looking at C_CLD's images, I think the way to tell them apart (maybe) is that they are bright for their size, and have a tidy round disc. The only way to be sure is to take a spectral analysis.
I might be confused by white dwarf stars, which are small hot and blue.
QSO โ (celestial object) Quasi-Stellar Object
Quasar โ (celestial object) QUASi-stellAR radio source(RE: initialize, I should update the links. It seems that SDSS is not supporting some of its older image cut-out system.)
Posted
-
by c_cld
I agree that quasar points posted in talk are "points" but of no resemblance with spectroscopic QSO imaged by CFHTLS megacam even at high redshifts.
Posted
-
by c_cld
Using the python tool Human Viewable (color composite) Image creation (authors Phil & all)
I processed object 1237659324406038647 (see previous post) and got
gri
ugr
Posted
-
by c_cld
Other kind of QSO: Blazar
QSO B1418+54 -- BL Lac - type object
Color composite (Phil's tool)
Posted
-
by c_cld
Please remind also your Science Board / The Objects/discussion http://talk.spacewarps.org/#/boards/BSW0000004/discussions/DSW00007m5 called
"The splitting of light from a quasar though a lens."
some objects appeared previously there.
Posted
-
by c_cld in response to Budgieye's comment.
ASW0009ao8 A blue QSO posted by jtreisner ๐
1237679322862452954 z spec= 2.473
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
Well, that one looks just like a blue star in the SpaceWarps images. It looks better in CFHT cut-out.
Nice blazar , where's my sunglasses 8)
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
Most of the SDSS dr7 images posted in the Galaxy Zoo Forum link are now back on line, except maybe the double green quasar.
Posted
-
by c_cld
Example of color variation in composite ugr, gri or riz filters to RGB channels for a remote QSO of strong Ly_alpha emission at 6029[ร ] :
1237673709329711312 z spec=3.96see optical spectrum
terapix ugr(Ly/orange), gri(Ly/green), riz(Ly/blue)
Posted
-
by c_cld
CFHQS J142952+544717 14:29:52.17 +54:47:17.7 http://arxiv.org/pdf/0912.0281v1.pdf
"This quasar was discovered in the CFHTLS Wide W3 region. However, it is much brighter than our Wide magnitude limit of z0 = 23 and has the second brightest absolute magnitude in this paper. The spectrum shows a strong continuum with only a weak Ly emission line at z = 6.21. This is consistent with the relatively red color of z0 - J = 0.81."
terapix riz composite
Red dot at top edge
CFHTLS cutout gri composite
red pinhead centred target
Could be very difficult to identify in a Spacewarps ASWxxxx image! ๐
Posted
-
by Tom_Collett scientist
You can't tell the difference between a star and a quasar from the spacewarps imaging alone. Both are point sources, and only look like a circle because the image is blurred by the atmosphere and the telescope. Quasars are typically very blue, in colour but they have a sharp break in their spectrum that can make high redshift quasars look red (or green).
As a rule of thumb, if you can tell that there are two stars/quasars near each other, you'll be able to see the lens between them (if it's a lensed quasar).
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
Actually, we are trying to tell the difference between a star and a quasar (without a spectrum), although we have a huge failure rate! We are looking for stars that are bright for their "size" with sharp circular edges. It probably depends too on type of quasar it is.
Since quasars have strong emission lines, it can affect the colours of the diffraction circles, I noticed that in the SDSS.
Anyway, small fuzzy stars are not likely to be "quasar points".
Posted
-
by c_cld
One amazing spectral QSO among the nearest, with very large spiral arm:
1237655369295724599 z 0.174
60 arcsec on the side
Posted
-
by Budgieye moderator
Wow, so much detail, but I miss the magenta colour of the nucleus. Is there no blue in the images?
Posted
-
by c_cld
#QSO 1237656567583670573 z spec 2.856
Posted
-
by c_cld
QSO with spikes in bottom left corner
z spec= 0.213
UKIDSS-K: UKIRT Infrared Deep Survey K-band with color table[edit Jan 23, 2016] imaged DECALS DR2
Brick: 3351p012, Objid: 1022
Posted
-
by c_cld
http://talk.spacewarps.org/#/subjects/ASW00074fk #no_lens (false positive)
1237661385994862858
Posted
-
by c_cld
http://talk.spacewarps.org/#/subjects/ASW00067j2 #no_lens (false positive)
#QSO #AGN SDSS J140049.60+554503.3
1237661418748510377
Posted
-
by c_cld
http://talk.spacewarps.org/#/subjects/ASW0001rcc
Posted
-
by c_cld
http://talk.spacewarps.org/#/subjects/ASW0007qoo
#QSO z_spec 2.763
#SA107 on edge
QSO West of arc
Posted
-
by c_cld
Dark Energy Survey (#DES)
DECam Legacy Survey Dark Energy Camera on the Blanco Telescope
Data Release 1
April 2015
#QSO #lensed SDSS J095122.57+263513.9 1237667112262107167
http://legacysurvey.org/viewer/?layer=decals-dr1j-edr&ra=147.84410&dec=+26.58716&zoom=16
QSO from DECam viewer
[edit Jan 23, 2016] DR2 release
in Decals DR2
Posted
-
by c_cld
http://talk.spacewarps.org/#/subjects/ASW0004k7v QSO at 8 o'clock
SDSS J022637.09-083118.1 z_spec 0.184
Posted
-
by c_cld
Discovery of two gravitationally lensed quasars in the Dark Energy Survey arXiv:1508.01203 Wed, 5 Aug 2015
DES J2146๏ฟฝ0047 is in the area of overlap between DES and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Two blue components are visible in the DES and SDSS images. The SDSS ber spectrum shows a quasar component at zs = 2.38 and absorption compatible with Mg II and Fe II at zl = 0.799, which we tentatively associate with the foreground lens galaxy. The long-slit Magellan spectra show that the blue components are resolved images of the same quasar. The Einstein Radius is 0.68" corresponding to an enclosed mass of 1:6 10^11M:
#QSO #lensed SDSS J214646.04-004744.2 1237656567581377069 ra,dec 326.69185, -0.79563; 21:46:46.04, -00:47:44.28
DECaLS DR1 images
Posted
-
by c_cld in response to c_cld's comment.
DECaLS DR2 release
DR2 1237656567581377069
Posted
-
by c_cld
SDSS J092455.87+021924.9: A gravitationally lensed quasar in quad configuration (z source spec=1.523, z lens= 0.394)
SDSS
decals-dr2
Keck NIRC2 instrument, Kp filter central 2.124ยตm, colormap: logarithmic thermal
my composite image from HST WFC3 UVIS2-C1K1C-SUB, filters F410M, F547M, F621M, F845M
Posted
-
by c_cld
sample of quasars in pair with similar looking object
1237665098453352649SDSS J080009.98+165509.4
1237657630046158964SDSS J082155.94+340412.8
1237651272425209946SDSS J084512.74+543421.4
1237655108900683961SDSS J085122.37+472249.0
1237667254534930667SDSS J092050.81+224113.8
1237653665794359499SDSS J094713.15+024743.7
1237650796220579874SDSS J094943.34+000536.2
1237661068181504012SDSS J110456.56+130711.1
1237671166167941135SDSS J110633.38-182123.6
1237667549273653362SDSS J112235.03+232634.9
1237654031403385001SDSS J113613.37+033840.9
1237648721233576010SDSS J122608.02-000602.2
1237668270824816739SDSS J133018.64+181032.1
1237665128013824063SDSS J133401.39+331534.3
1237662198812180494SDSS J135404.14+110725.8
1237651752949710977SDSS J135944.21+012809.8
1237674604289785940SDSS J141235.37+004104.1
1237667910068928728SDSS J142341.94+204001.5
1237662198278979863SDSS J142815.63+095443.5
1237665350245220423SDSS J144208.77+260903.7
1237648721251336404SDSS J150824.22-000603.8
1237662306731294807SDSS J151109.85+335701.7
1237655465926131922SDSS J151236.94+553901.0
1237648704060129648SDSS J151538.95-001240.7
1237662662675398693SDSS J151623.87+310336.3
1237665427567214737SDSS J152024.49+211155.4
1237655469137199467SDSS J152631.31+015103.1
1237662619187216578SDSS J155225.62+300902.0
1237668332573491544SDSS J160014.58+102852.4
1237662697575547017SDSS J160614.69+230518.1
1237665535470141651SDSS J161848.15+171459.4
1237663542064972528SDSS J205333.01-010058.3
1237663278462140544SDSS J233713.66+005610.8
Posted
-
by c_cld
possible other candidates with QSO spectrum
1237679476941718070SDSS J012142.20+211407.2
1237664879412248923SDSS J092115.47+285444.3
1237668288007897790SDSS J100251.86+154718.2
1237679005022224414SDSS J231757.54+043220.7
Posted
-
by c_cld
Thumbnails sample recap of new lensed quasars candidates from SDSS survey, not yet listed in catalogs and to be confirmed or deprecated as binary or as impostors.
discovered by that kind of viewing among so many pairs ๐
| IAUname | bestobjid | ra | dec | specobjid | plate | mjd | fiberid | z | NeighborObjID | separation " | |--------------------------|---------------------|-----------|----------|---------------------|-------|-------|---------|-------|---------------------|--------------| | SDSS J073223.90+360044.6 | 1237651252550697462 | 113.09961 | 36.01239 | 2334132131552323584 | 2073 | 53728 | 515 | 2.734 | 1237651252550697463 | 5.62 | | SDSS J073534.58+203634.2 | 1237660563502137970 | 113.89411 | 20.60950 | 5044158120294486016 | 4480 | 55591 | 460 | 2.188 | 1237660563502137971 | 3.54 | | SDSS J083228.49+563234.2 | 1237663530797957374 | 128.11871 | 56.54285 | 2007637370626664448 | 1783 | 53386 | 574 | 0.683 | 1237663530797957375 | 3.09 | | SDSS J083649.55+484154.0 | 1237654383585656941 | 129.20647 | 48.69836 | 619362079618394112 | 550 | 51959 | 426 | 1.711 | 1237654383585656942 | 4.07 | | SDSS J092659.57+062326.7 | 1237658300600484013 | 141.74822 | 6.39077 | 1116985110923601920 | 992 | 52644 | 336 | 0.667 | 1237658300600484014 | 4.58 | | SDSS J094122.50+051823.8 | 1237658423010525423 | 145.34379 | 5.30664 | 5485441070710788096 | 4872 | 55944 | 206 | 0.343 | 1237658423010525422 | 3.86 | | SDSS J094122.50+051823.8 | 1237658423010525423 | 145.34379 | 5.30664 | 5485441070710788096 | 4872 | 55944 | 206 | 0.343 | 1237658423010525424 | 1.74 | | SDSS J094122.71+051821.6 | 1237658423010525422 | 145.34466 | 5.30601 | 1118056036356352000 | 993 | 52710 | 136 | 1.546 | 1237658423010525424 | 5.50 | | SDSS J125952.05+623022.1 | 1237655370363830429 | 194.96689 | 62.50614 | 7847529605631971328 | 6970 | 56444 | 26 | 2.306 | 1237655370363830428 | 9.06 | | SDSS J142758.88-012130.3 | 1237655499744018693 | 216.99537 | -1.35844 | 4535147459056111616 | 4028 | 55621 | 82 | 2.269 | 1237655499744018694 | 6.24 | | SDSS J143836.26+174538.1 | 1237667733986345165 | 219.65111 | 17.76061 | 6157735532929355776 | 5469 | 56037 | 687 | 0.584 | 1237667733986345166 | 8.41 | | SDSS J154107.46-003716.0 | 1237655693556580446 | 235.28109 | -0.62113 | 354698630730377216 | 315 | 51663 | 146 | 0.754 | 1237655693556580447 | 5.68 | | SDSS J155752.31+342140.0 | 1237662473692315813 | 239.46799 | 34.36111 | 1595414514344421376 | 1417 | 53141 | 52 | 1.265 | 1237662473692315815 | 7.08 | | SDSS J164045.57+193255.3 | 1237662225166959350 | 250.18989 | 19.54870 | 4709728187273056256 | 4183 | 55447 | 323 | 0.778 | 1237662225166959351 | 4.81 | | SDSS J164045.66+193257.2 | 1237662225166959349 | 250.19028 | 19.54922 | 4573611120581808128 | 4062 | 55383 | 748 | 0.195 | 1237662225166959351 | 2.66 | | SDSS J092524.61+435022.8 | 1237657630053040401 | 141.35257 | 43.83968 | 979640984977565696 | 870 | 52325 | 393 | 0.352 | 1237657630053040400 | 4.34 | | SDSS J092524.61+435022.8 | 1237657630053040401 | 141.35257 | 43.83968 | 979640984977565696 | 870 | 52325 | 393 | 0.352 | 1237657630053040546 | 10.85 | | SDSS J092523.72+435027.8 | 1237657630053040546 | 141.34887 | 43.84106 | 5287341517857230848 | 4696 | 56354 | 420 | 1.003 | 1237657630053040400 | 15.13 | | SDSS J092523.72+435027.8 | 1237657630053040546 | 141.34887 | 43.84106 | 5287341517857230848 | 4696 | 56354 | 420 | 1.003 | 1237657630053040401 | 10.85 |
bestobjid: QSO with spectrum, or lens galaxy if redshift z less than 0.4
NeighborObjid: twin QSO without spectrum, or lens galaxy if separation less than 2
Posted
-
by c_cld
QSO pair candidate or gravitationally lensed QSO by group galaxies?
SDSS J120426.66+015534.8 1237651735757455416 z_spec 1.376
SDSS J120426.14+015527.8 1237651735757455413 ra 181.108937365, dec 1.924388905 separation 0.175' = ~10.5"
"star" in QSO color space
PanStarrs z/i/r
Posted